The 21st International Conference “Man and Working Environment”
SAFETY ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, INDUSTRY, EDUCATION (SEMSIE 2025)   
PROCEEDINGS OF PAPERS 
25-26 September 2025, SOKOBANJA, SERBIA  

Filip Kovačić , Tomislav Katić , Darko Palačić 

ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY – HOW TO ACHIEVE EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Abstract:

Occupational health and safety (OHS) is not a phenomenon of the modern world and has deep roots in history. The history of occupational safety can be divided into several phases of development. EU-OSHA estimates that the social cost of work-related injuries and diseases is 3.9% of global GDP and 3.3% of EU GDP. The loss of GDP in the EU is the lowest of all regions according to the classification of the World Health Organization (WHO). In these challenging times, when the world of work is experiencing various rapid changes, the evaluation of the performance of occupational health and safety is becoming increasingly important. It is necessary to monitor various performance indicators at different levels and functions and to use different methods. A review of recent scientific literature and OHS international standards in this area has been conducted. The article presents the latest considerations on how to achieve effective evaluation of OHS performance using international standards.

Keywords:

Evaluation, indicators, occupational health and safety, performance

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

-

REFERENCES:
  • Alli, B. O. (2008). Fundamental principles of occupational health and safety. International Labour Organization. Geneva. 
  • Bottomley, B. (2021). OHSMS Performance measures that add up. Occupational health and safety management systems. Proceedings of the First National Conference, WorkCover NSW. 131–150. http://www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/formspublications/publi cations/documents/ohs_management_systems_4231.pdf.  
  • Department of Employment and Workplace Relations. (2005). Guidance on the use of positive performance indicators to improve workplace health and safety. Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/ Publications/Documents/150/GuidanceOnUseOfPPIs_ 2005_PDF.pdf.  
  • Dyck, D. & Roithmayr, T. (2024). Great safety performance: an improvement process using leading indicators. AAOHN J. 12(52). 511–520. 
  • European Commission. (2021). The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/webpub/empl/european-pillar-of-social-rights/en/index.html  
  • European sustainability reporting standards (ESRS). ANNEX I to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards. Official Journal of the European Union 22 December 2023 including the corrigendum published on 18 April 2024. https://xbrl.efrag.org/e-esrs/esrs-set1-2023.html  
  • Eurostat: Database, data for common economic sectors in the EU-15 (1994-2009) and for all economic sectors in the EU-27 (2010-2018). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database  
  • Friend, M. A. & Kohn, J. P. (2007). Fundamentals of occupational safety and health. Government Institutes. Linham. 
  • Health and Safety Executive. (2001). A guide to measuring health and safety performance. http://www.hse.gov.uk/opsunit/index.htm. 
  • Health and Safety Executive. (2006). Developing Process Safety Indicators. A step-by-step guide for chemical and major hazard industries. http://antarisconsulting.com/docs/guides/unit_a/A3_ HSG254_Developing_Process_Safety_Indicators.pdf.  
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2024). ISO 45004:2024: Occupational health and safety management — Guidelines on performance evaluation. ISO. https://www.iso.org  
  • Kim, Y., Park, J., & Park, M. (2016). Creating a culture of prevention in occupational safety and health practice. Safety and Health at Work, 7(2), 89–96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.02.002  
  • Karwowski, W., Rahimi, M., & Mihaly T. (1998). Effects of computerized automation and robotics on safety performance of a manufacturing plant. Journal of Occupational Accidents. 10. 217–233.  
  • National Occupational Health and Safety Commission. (1994). Positive performance indicators for OHS: beyond lost time injuries. Part 1. Commonwealth of Australia. doi:10.1080/10803548.2005. 11076645.  
  • Nelson B. (2008). Inspections and severity: two safety leading indicators that you can use today. Occup Health Saf. 6. 87–90. http://www.indsci.com/docs/Press/OHS_0708.pdf.  
  • O’Neill, S., Wolfe, K. (2017). Measuring and reporting on work health & safety. Safe Work Australia. Canberra. 
  • Palačić, D. (2010). Istraživanje razvoja i utjecaja kulture sigurnosti na sustav upravljanja sigurnošću. Sigurnost, 52(2), 105–112. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/84104 
  • Pawłowska, Z. (2015). Using lagging and leading indicators for the evaluation of occupational safety and health performance in industry. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 21(3). 284-290, DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1081769  
  • Wolff, J. (2007). Introduction: What is the value of preventing a fatality? In: Lewens, T. (eds.) Risk: Philosophical Perspectives. London. Routledge

© 2023 Faculty of Occupational Safety - Multimedia